Tuesday 6 October 2015

Summary of article


What drives a successful e-Learning?

An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction

By
Pei-Chen Sun, Ray J. Tsai, Glenn Finger, Yueh-Yang Chen, Dowming Yeh
 
This research developed an integrated model from previous studies which identifies critical factors influencing e-learner satisfaction. It consist of thirteen factors in six dimensions as shown in figure 1. Results from this research indicated that seven out of thirteen factors cannot be neglected when implementing a successful e-learning environment. These are: learner computer anxiety, instructor attitude toward e-Learning, e-Learning course flexibility, e-Learning course quality, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and diversity in assessments. These factors can serve as potential obstacles not to overlook when institutions want to develop and implement e-learning course.

Learner dimension
-Learner attitude toward computers
-Learner computer anxiety
-Learner Internet self-efficacy

Instructor dimension
-Instructor response timeliness
-Instructor attitude toward e-Learning

Course dimension
-E-Learning course flexibility
-E-Learning course quality

Technology dimension
-Technology quality
-Internet quality
 
Design dimension
-Perceived usefulness
-Perceived easy of use

Environmental dimension
-Diversity in assessment
-Learner perceived interaction with others
 
 

Fig. 1. Dimensions and antecedents of perceived e-Learner satisfaction
 
If I apply these factors from the research in my context which is the medical institution of disadvantaged students of South Africa, I have many more critical factors to emphasis for students satisfaction. These are as follows: 

Learner dimension

·         Factors such as computer literacy and internet self-efficacy might be additional factors with computer anxiety, as majority of our students come from rural areas.

 Instructor dimension

·         Instructor’s attitude towards computer and network technology is very important as some of our lecturers prefer traditional teaching methods. 

Course dimension

·         Course flexibility of time, space, location, methods etc, as well as, course quality such as course design, teaching material, course schedule, discussion arrangements and multimedia presentation of course are strong factors of student satisfaction.

Technology dimension

·         Technology use in our institution faces many challenges such as frequent technical difficulties, poor internet quality and speed.

Design dimension

·         Usefulness of the e-learning program and easy use of it, definitely give higher learning satisfaction.

Environment dimension

·         Assessment in e-learning using diversity of assessments (which include formative assessment, self-assessment and/ or peer assessment) also give students’ satisfaction but the challenges in my institution is feasibility in terms of administrative tasks.

In conclusion, this research provides insights for institutions to strengthen their e-Learning implementation and further improve learner satisfaction.

 

 

7 comments:

  1. Dear Yamin

    Thank you for sharing the information. I have learnt a lot from it. It reinforces issues of needs analysis of the ADDIE framework.
    Regarding the issue about the challenges of your undergraduate population of rural background, how about designing a training on basic ICT skills during the first contact weeks for all undergraduate candidates. Just like our academic writing skills course during our Mphil orientation.
    I liked the finding of computer anxiety and attitudes among instructors. I have observed that old instructors at our institution have the current problem. Is there a solution for this? Because training has not helped our situation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Beloved,
      Thank you for your suggestion.
      For instructor issue, multi-factors are involved e.g motivation of instructor, his/her positive attitude towards learners and students, his/her positive attitude towards e-learning, as well as high levels of computer & educational competence (Ruggeri et al,2013).

      Delete
  2. Thank you for the information Yamin. It sound like a really interesting article with a lot of factors to keep in mind when designing a new educational technology. I totally agree with all your findings for how the design of an educational technology can impact the students at SMU as we share the same students. Most of our modules write computerized assessments for their anatomy blocks and it is important to keep in mind the factors that can influence the achievement of the students. I have also seen that the older people in the department has been very slow in adapting quality powerpoint presentations and to use the departmental computer test. I must tell you that the Biology department has also started to use the computer test (Riddel) for their more than 500 students, so not all people are slow to the party of using technology to their advantage

    ReplyDelete
  3. Computerized tests are great. So perhaps you need to start thinking about how you could use technology for activities that can show students' skill in other ways than knowledge recall.
    think, think, think...... :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello Yamin,
    I completely agree with all the important factors that cannot be overlooked when considering a successful e-learning implementation as mentioned in your article. I think you have critically integrated these factors and its implications very well within your context. Generally i must say that the issue of learner computer anxiety and instructors attitude towards e-learning can be found even here in Ghana where internet access is still a challenge in most institutions.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete